CALLS TO BETTER PROTECT CLIENT-LAWYER CONFIDENTIALITY

CALLS TO BETTER PROTECT CLIENT-LAWYER CONFIDENTIALITY

THE Law Council of Australia is calling on the federal government to further amend the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 to require law enforcement and intelligence agencies to obtain a warrant to access client-lawyer communications.

This follows the Government's intention to amend the act around journalist's telecommunications data.

"The Law Council's position is simple - lawyer communications deserve the same level of protection to that afforded to journalists," says Law Council of Australia President, Duncan McConnel.

 He adds that people who engage a lawyer need to know their communications are confidential and that legal professional privilege is not lost under the proposed data retention bill.

"The confidentiality of client-lawyer communication is a long-held common law right and we need to be vigilant to protect it," he says.

Currently, the bill does not provide any assurance that the confidential relationship between a client and a lawyer will not be compromised.

"It is not difficult to envisage situations where client-lawyer telecommunications data would reveal a range of information that could compromise confidentiality and even legal professional privilege," says McConnel.

"For example, what would happen if a whistle-blower seeks legal advice prior to, or during communication with a journalist? Under the proposed amendments, the journalist's communication may be confidential, but what of the communications between a journalist or the journalist's source and the lawyer?

"Data could allow inferences to be drawn from whether a lawyer has been contacted; the identity and location of the client, lawyer and witnesses; the number of communications and type of communications between a lawyer and a client, witnesses and the duration of these communications."

The Law Council of Australia says the potential for client legal privilege to attach to the disclosure of a client's identity and contact details means that heightened protections for client-lawyer telecommunications data should be built into the legislation.

"The introduction of a warrant process to access client-lawyer telecommunications data is a simple but effective safeguard," says McConnel.

"As a minimum, a parliamentary inquiry should be conducted into access to telecommunications data of lawyers to ensure there are sufficient safeguards to protect privileged and confidential information."

Help us deliver quality journalism to you.
As a free and independent news site providing daily updates
during a period of unprecedented challenges for businesses everywhere
we call on your support

How communications technology can raise the bar on customer service, employee experience
Partner Content
From capturing feedback early to providing messages with a higher rate of cut-through, ...
Advertisement

Related Stories

EML Payments awarded $320m government contract to help stimulate the Spanish arts sector

EML Payments awarded $320m government contract to help stimulate the Spanish arts sector

Global payment solutions business EML Payments (ASX: EML) will play...

Microbio goes public as med-tech tackles condition that causes 11 million deaths per year

Microbio goes public as med-tech tackles condition that causes 11 million deaths per year

Brisbane-based medical technology company Microbio has stepped...

Available anywhere and everywhere: Lifestyle brand The Somewhere Co. targets global expansion

Available anywhere and everywhere: Lifestyle brand The Somewhere Co. targets global expansion

Despite a difficult few months for everyday wares outfit The Somewh...

G'day space: Australia is "go" for launch

G'day space: Australia is "go" for launch

Just after midnight on Monday 27 June, above the vast wilderness of...