CHRISCO HAMPERED WITH $200,000 FINE

CHRISCO HAMPERED WITH $200,000 FINE

CHRISCO may be known for spreading cheer as one of Australia's largest Christmas retailers, but the company is less than jolly today after being hit with a whopping fine for sales misconduct.

The Christmas hamper distributor was put on the Federal Court's naughty list and ordered to pay a $200,000 penalty after it made unlawful statements regarding its lay-by policy.

Chrisco made the representation that its customers couldn't cancel lay-by purchases after making their final payments, a statement contested by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) as false or misleading under Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

Contrary to Chrisco's policies, the ACL provides that customers are free to cancel their lay-by purchases at any time prior to delivery, even if payments have been made in full.

The Court also found that Chrisco's 'HeadStart Plan' contained an unfair contract term, as it allowed the company to continue taking direct debit payments after the customer had finished paying for their lay-by order.

To avoid having further money automatically taken from their accounts, customers were required to opt out of the debiting process.

ACCC chairman Rod Sims says Chrisco's case should act as a warning to other lay-by retailers to not mislead their customers and to be stringent in following all legal requirements under the ACL.

"The importance of the penalty imposed by the court against Chrisco is that it sends a strong message to businesses using lay-by as a method of sale that they must meet all of their ACL obligations, and do not mislead consumers about their rights," he says.

Sims says the lay-by system thrives particularly in the lead-up to Christmas, making it imperative for companies to make sure all policies are in line.

"We understand that making purchases by lay-by agreement is a convenient way for many Australians to shop, particularly for products such as Christmas hampers and presents.

"Consumers have termination rights at any time before the delivery of the goods, subject to a reasonable termination charge in some circumstances.

"The ACL provides that lay-by agreements must be in writing and transparent."

The ACCC was initially alerted to Chrisco's dodgy dealings via the Indigenous Consumer Assistance Network, as part of the ACCC's Indigenous consumer protection and outreach work.

Help us deliver quality journalism to you.
As a free and independent news site providing daily updates
during a period of unprecedented challenges for businesses everywhere
we call on your support

Four ways businesses can use artificial intelligence to triumph in 2022
Partner Content
The last two years have delivered major disruption to the technology industry and broad...
PROS
Advertisement

Related Stories

Link Group receives $86.5m offer for banking and credit management business

Link Group receives $86.5m offer for banking and credit management business

Just one week after receiving a $2.88 billion offer from The Carlyl...

MUA withdraws industrial action against Patrick in lead up to Christmas

MUA withdraws industrial action against Patrick in lead up to Christmas

The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) and Patrick Terminals have co...

Construction on $300 million Sydney CBD development to start next year

Construction on $300 million Sydney CBD development to start next year

Construction on a new 14-storey commercial tower at 333 Kent Street...

Fawkner Property acquires Stockland Cairns for $146 million

Fawkner Property acquires Stockland Cairns for $146 million

Melbourne-based Fawkner Property has acquired major shopping centre...